← Search

Jane Metz

— year-end
47 matches · 22W–25L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Jane Metz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2022-06-06 · Bruner, Katherine · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bree Moseley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2022-05-16 · Bruner, Katherine · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kami Myrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2022-04-08 · Bruner, Katherine · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Bruner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-03-11 · Bruner, Katherine · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Bruner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-02-06 · Nelson, Cydney · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-4
W
2022-02-04 · Bruner, Katherine · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Bruner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-01-30 · Nelson, Cydney · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-5
W
2022-01-28 · Bruner, Katherine · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy McCarthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2021-12-19 · Nelson, Cydney · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Petrie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2021-12-10 · Bruner, Katherine · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Schibig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2021-12-05 · Nelson, Cydney · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Petrie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5, 1-0
L
Dina Mitchell / Amanda Miller
2021-11-14 · Nelson, Cydney · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams12 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.5% of games
4.0
42.9%
15W–20L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal