← Search

Laura-Elizabeth Smith

— year-end
47 matches · 21W–26L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Laura-Elizabeth Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-09-09 · LCTA18/Smoak/CTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Pieper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-01 · LCTA40/Richey/Kiawah · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tessa Radziej
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · LCTA18/Smoak/CTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary-Patterson Suggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · LCTA40/Richey/Kiawah · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marsha Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · LCTA18/Smoak/CTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shannon Smoak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · LCTA18/Smoak/CTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Libby Kowalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · LCTA40/Ambrite/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Milo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-22 · LCTA40/Ambrite/Maybank · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Milo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · LCTA40/Ambrite/Maybank · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Milo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-25 · LCTA40/Ambrite/Maybank · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Milo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-03-23 · LCTA (B) 4.0W 18 & Over (Smoak) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Matheson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Jodi Mallon / Kathleen Allen
2026-03-04 · LCTA (B) 4.0W 18 & Over (Smoak) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Matheson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 51.6% of games
4.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 45.9% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 34.7% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
9 matches
#2 Singles
11%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova