Martin Ryan
125 matches · 60W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Martin Ryan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history125 matches
W
Nick Fohl / Darcy Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
Thomas Hurley / David Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
Robert Mulligan / John Voege
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Robert Johnson / Michael Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
Edward Freeman / John Voege
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
James Hoffman / Matthew Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Tyson Smith / David Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Teams6 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
52.6%
40W–36L · 51% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.1% of games
7.0
41.9%
13W–18L · 46.3% of games
7.5mixed
50%
6W–6L · 54.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.