← Search

Brian Doyle

Milford, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 48W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brian Doyle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-06-24 · WESB:Westboro:Liedell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bharath Padala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · WESB:Westboro:Liedell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Liedell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · WESB:Westboro:Liedell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bharath Padala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · WESB:Westboro:Liedell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Eisenstock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-27 · WESB:Westboro:Liedell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bharath Padala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-20 · WESB:Westboro:Liedell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bharath Padala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-13 · WESB:Westboro:Liedell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Liedell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-25 · WESB:Westboro:Liedell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Eisenstock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-11 · WESB:Westboro:Liedell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with G Pelletier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-04 · WESB:Westboro:Liedell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Eisenstock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-28 · WESB:Westboro:Liedell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Eisenstock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-5, 0-1
W
2025-05-21 · WESB:Westboro:Liedell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Eisenstock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
63.6%
42W–24L · 52.5% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 44.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer