← Search

Ramon Moore

Hazel Park, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 35W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ramon Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-07-28 · PEACH-Sellers 55s 7.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Pawl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · PEACH-Sellers 55s 7.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Pawl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · PEACH-Sellers 40s 3.5M F2 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gilbert Galicia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · PEACH-Sellers 55s 7.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Pawl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-06 · PEACH-Sellers 40s 3.5M F2 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madhup Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · PEACH-Sellers 55s 7.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rene Lanzanas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Jiten Thakkar / Nimesh Patel
2026-06-15 · PEACH-Sellers 40s 3.5M F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Bates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-18 · PEACH-Sellers 40s 3.5M F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Hang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Sinutko mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cristy Lundh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Swiderski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Mazur mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
58.8%
20W–14L · 54.1% of games
4.0
7.7%
1W–12L · 28.7% of games
7.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 48% of games
8.0mixed
7.7%
1W–12L · 31.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert