← Search

Janet Lawrence

Chattanooga, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 26W–28L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Janet Lawrence to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-08-24 · Sorrow · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Sorrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-03 · Sorrow · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anita Decosimo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · Phillips/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Glen Urey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
Natalie Martin / David Martin
2026-08-01 · Phillips/Chattanooga · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-27 · Sorrow · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Sorrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · Phillips/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-06 · Sorrow · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Tuttle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
David Martin / Natalie Martin
2026-06-28 · Phillips/Chattanooga · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · Miller/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Henson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
Bernadette Dorris / Jill Chambless
2026-06-01 · Miller/Chattanooga · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Deborah Nation / Linda Davis
2026-05-11 · Miller/Chattanooga · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · Long-Hardin-Miller/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eileen Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 61.9% of games
3.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 42.9% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 50% of games
3.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.1% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 21.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams