← Search

Michelle Jobe

Oregon City, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 20W–28L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Jobe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-06-06 · CAC-McAra · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tami Oglesby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · CAC-McAra · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tami McAra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · CAC-McAra · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Kralj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · CAC-Delplato · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tami Oglesby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-07 · CAC-Delplato · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tami McAra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-02-15 · CAC-Delplato · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Devencenzi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · CAC-Delplato · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Devencenzi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · CAC-DelPlato · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tami McAra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Cathryn Hansen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Carol Devencenzi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-04 · CAC-Ferek/Delplato · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Ferek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-04-05 · CAC-Ferek/Delplato · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Ferek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
40%
8W–12L · 48.2% of games
4.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 34.2% of games
8.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal