← Search

Craig Peters

Knoxville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 5W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Craig Peters to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2025-12-13 · Haub/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Harano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-12-07 · Haub/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Whitehead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-12-03 · Haub/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Whitehead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-16 · Haub/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Rockwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-05 · Haub/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-10 · Lucas/Knoxville · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Haub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-04-26 · Lucas/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Haub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-12 · Lucas/Knoxville · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Webster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-06 · Chaloux/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russ Gaby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-05 · Lucas/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Jarvis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-03-16 · Chaloux/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Harano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-09 · Chaloux/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Chaloux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
21.7%
5W–18L · 40.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams