Michelle Parks
222 matches · 136W–86L · seasons 2022–2027
Captains: add Michelle Parks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history222 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-5
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-3, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Teams73 teams · 2022–2027
CHI E 40W4.0 6.ACN Sheridan Sat 4 $24
CHI E M18.8.0 5.PF Parks Fri 7:30 $22
NITA E 40W18a River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette-Jurczyk/Dau
WH Ballines FWL A18-4.0WW
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 6Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $25
CDTA E M40&O7.0 4HF Parks Sat 12:30 $22
CDTA E M40&O8.0 3RT Lam2 Sat 2 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 7.Nielsen Lund Sun 5 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 8.Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $22
CDTA S ComboW8.5 3.RCLB Cal Wed 7 $22
CDTA S ComboX7.5 6.HF Parks Tue 7 $22
CDTA S M40&O8.0 3.RT Lam-2 Sat 5 $27
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 6.Nielsen Lund Sun 4 $25
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 10.Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $22
CDTA W ComboX7.5 5.HF Parks Fri 7 $22
CDTA W ComboX8.5 2.CPW Yang Sat 6 $28
CDTA W M40&O7.0 5.HF Parks Sat 12:30 $22
CDTA W M40&O8.0 2.RT Lam-2 Sat 7 $27
NITA E 40W18b River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA S 40W18d River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA S 75WCb Homewood-Young/Anderson
NITA W 40W18d River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
WH Ballines WSL A18-4.0WW
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
57.6%
38W–28L · 54.6% of games
4.0
85.3%
29W–5L · 63.2% of games
7.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 64.3% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61%
36W–23L · 54.9% of games
7.5mixed
41.7%
10W–14L · 51.1% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 39% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
54 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.