← Search

Janet Sweezey

Houston, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 28W–18L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Janet Sweezey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-09-02 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dawn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · WNCT Reeks (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Vesel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dorothy Singhal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-01 · WNCR Wiener (ARC South) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donald Kusz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · WNCT Reeks (Aston Park) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Vesel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-14 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dorothy Singhal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
James Wilson / Leanne Groban
2026-06-10 · WNCR Wiener (ARC South) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Bell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · WNCT Reeks (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Vesel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · WNCT Reeks (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Baugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · WNCT Reeks (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Baugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · WNCT Reeks (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Nikolov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-15 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Hash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams76 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 54% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.5% of games
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 72.7% of games
8.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.6% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova