← Search

Carrie Cave

GREENEVILLE, TN
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
10 matches · 2W–8L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Carrie Cave to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history10 matches
W
2026-05-20 · Smead/Greeneville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Holloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Jaelyn Moore / Katie Roberson
2026-05-15 · Cave/Greeneville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lara Neumann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Patience Mckeever / Chelsea Anderson
2026-05-14 · Cave/Greeneville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · SMEAD/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-06 · Smead/Greeneville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Joy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · Smead/Greeneville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-04-18 · SMEAD/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
Katie Roberson / Stephanie Hite
2026-04-16 · Cave/Greeneville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · SMEAD/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-14 · SMEAD/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova