← Search

Catherine Go

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 87W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Go to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history164 matches
L
2026-06-13 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deana Julka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeri Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Lovett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-01 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-01-17 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-01-03 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Lovett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-11-22 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Loann Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-15 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Lovett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-11-09 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Lovett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Lovett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-10-12 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ingeborg Holliday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-09-28 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Lovett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams90 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
52.5%
31W–28L · 53.2% of games
4.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.2% of games
8.0
66.7%
24W–12L · 57.3% of games
9.0
20%
1W–4L · 36% of games
8.0mixed
50%
16W–16L · 49.1% of games
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
43 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal