← Search

Jane Schmidt

Mansfield, TX
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
22 matches · 8W–14L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jane Schmidt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-07-03 · SOAKS BOYD · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darci Miklos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-05 · SOAKS BOYD · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Abraham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-25 · ATC BYARS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenny Luningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-02-19 · SOAKS DICKINSON · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Wayland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-16 · ATC BYARS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Cottraux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-02-13 · ATC BYARS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Fagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-12 · SOAKS DICKINSON · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Wayland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-06 · SOAKS BOYD · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Chonko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-12-12 · SOAKS BOYD · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-11 · SOAKS DICKINSON · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cecilia Gallardo Solano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-03 · ATC SCHMIDT · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Fagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2025-10-27 · ATC SCHMIDT · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Woody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.8% of games
7.0
20%
2W–8L · 40.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King