← Search

William Hickl

— year-end
23 matches · 8W–15L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add William Hickl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
W
2026-03-26 · Sugar Creek - Beer 30 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with CHRISTOPHER BARTON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-19 · Sugar Creek - Beer 30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryce Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-05 · Sugar Creek - Beer 30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Sparks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-21 · Sugar Creek - Beer 30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Latimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-07 · Sugar Creek - Beer 30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Latimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Prince
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Edmiaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2024-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Edmiaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Finger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2023-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Warren Revell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2023-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Prince
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
30%
6W–14L · 44.8% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer