← Search

Nancy Franich

— year-end
16 matches · 4W–12L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nancy Franich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
L
2026-06-14 · IMPERIAL TC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Marlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-31 · IMPERIAL TC 18AW3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Mecozzi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-17 · IMPERIAL TC 18AW3.0A · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-12 · IMPERIAL TC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Root
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · IMPERIAL TC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Gigli-Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-19 · IMPERIAL TC 18AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Root
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · IMPERIAL TC 40AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lesley-Yvonne Moussette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · IMPERIAL TC 40AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Marlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · IMPERIAL TC 40AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elaine de la Torre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · IMPERIAL TC 40AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Marlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-21 · IMPERIAL TC 40AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Seeger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · IMPERIAL TC 40AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary B Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 39.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 69% of the time
#1 Doubles
69%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
3 matches
#2 Singles
6%
1 match
#3 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams