← Search

Chaninda Narakorn

Palm Bay, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 39W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chaninda Narakorn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
Jacqueline Pitts / Michelle Smith
2026-08-15 · Fee - Watters · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melissa Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Brevard/Flores · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Angel Alayon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Joseph Romanelli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Thomas Knights mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · EFSC - McLachlan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Senta Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · Brevard/Swanson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Devereaux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Thomas Knights mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-05-16 · Brevard/Flores · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Daniel Flores mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-10 · Brevard/Swanson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela Copeland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-12 · Brevard/Swanson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Husty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Rachel Rodriguez / Wheeler Crawford
2026-01-25 · #2 Doubles · with Melissa Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-25 · #1 Doubles · with Melissa Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
80%
20W–5L · 60.6% of games
8.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.3% of games
10.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.3% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer