← Search

Amy Jo Akins

Tuscaloosa, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 28W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amy Jo Akins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-08-24 · TWC Sandras 18+ 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ciana Ortiguera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · TTC - 7.5 Combo - McKnight · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melanie Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · TTC - 7.5 Combo - McKnight · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gayle Faught
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · TWC Sandras 18+ 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandi LaBresh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · TU - McKnight · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Donna Terry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-02 · TU - McKnight · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stanislava Chtarbanova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-07-01 · TU - McKnight · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Eberhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · TTC - Edwards 3.5 MXD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glen Akins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · TU - McKnight · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Taylor Baggett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · TWC Sandras 40+ 3.0-4.0 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Danielle Oliver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · TU - McKnight · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Janie Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · TU - McKnight · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Deborah Swanquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 56.8% of games
3.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 55% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.3% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal