← Search

Lisa Goodrich

— year-end
86 matches · 44W–42L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Lisa Goodrich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-09-12 · The Woods - Tracy · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hope Keane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-05 · The Woods - Tracy · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Creveling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-29 · The Woods - Tracy · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maria Quiros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-17 · Marsh Landing - Haines · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darin Pobst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · Marsh Landing - Fontaine · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sherri Ouchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · The Woods - Tracy · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hope Keane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-16 · Marsh Landing - Haines · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Bell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · Marsh Landing - Fontaine · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Fontaine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · The Woods - Tracy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-11 · Marsh Landing - Stokes · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Gennerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-17 · The Woods - Tracy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · Marsh Landing - Stokes · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Gennerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 65.6% of games
4.0
29.6%
8W–19L · 42.2% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.6% of games
7.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.7% of games
8.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 57.2% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer