← Search

Zach Barden

Toledo, OH
0.0 year-end
108 matches · 69W–39L · seasons 2017–2022

Captains: add Zach Barden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
L
2022-10-09 · NWO 8.5M Combo Barden/Derian- Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Charles Green
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
Sean Waters / Thomas Michalski
2022-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Andrew Derian championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Jeremy Flora / James Riggs
2022-08-13 · #2 Doubles · with Andrew Derian championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-07-25 · NWO 18&Over 4.5 Men Gargas-TTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elliot Beak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2022-07-18 · NWO 18&Over 4.5 Men Gargas-TTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Gargas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2022-06-13 · NWO 18&Over 4.5 Men Gargas-TTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elliot Beak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2022-06-06 · NWO 18&Over 4.5 Men Gargas-TTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elliot Beak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2022-05-23 · NWO 18&Over 4.5 Men Gargas-TTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elliot Beak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-04-29 · NWO 18&Over 9.0Mx Barden-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Rumpf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-03-20 · #1 Doubles · with Elliot Beak championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2022-03-20 · #1 Doubles · with Elliot Beak championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W
2022-03-19 · #1 Doubles · with Elliot Beak championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
62.8%
27W–16L · 52.5% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 64.3% of games
9.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert