← Search

Andrea Zak

North Ridgeville, OH
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 99W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrea Zak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
L
2026-07-30 · A40 4.5W PW Allison · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-28 · A18 4.5W PM Meyers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · A40 4.5W PW Allison · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · A18 4.5W PM Meyers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gabriela Heideman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · A40 4.5W PW Allison · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacey Varuolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · A18 4.5W PM Meyers · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · A18 4.5W PM Meyers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Djohan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-19 · X18 9.0 PW Began · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alexander Hurtuk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-18 · A40 4.5W PW Allison · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · A18 4.5W PM Meyers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · X18 9.0 PW Began · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jason Trapp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · A40 4.5W PW Allison · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
100%
8W–0L · 73.6% of games
4.5
62.5%
35W–21L · 53.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
78.3%
18W–5L · 59.8% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 50.2% of games
9.0mixed
76.2%
16W–5L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
21 matches
#1 Singles
8%
11 matches
#1 Female Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert