← Search

Jeffrey Giordano

Newark, DE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 42W–25L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Giordano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-08-19 · #2 Doubles · with David Knight championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-13 · Cambridge Cavaliers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-10 · Watermen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Gundaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · Cambridge Cavaliers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · Watermen · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-24 · Cambridge Cavaliers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
Bill Strong / John Price
2026-06-10 · Cambridge Cavaliers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · Watermen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Deleeuw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-29 · Cambridge Cavaliers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · Watermen · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anshuman Agrawal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-10 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
68.6%
35W–16L · 57% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.4% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.7% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 55% of the time
#1 Singles
55%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer