← Search

David Schwartz

Mahwah, NJ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 83W–26L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Schwartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
L
Joe Caiello / Hang Yuan
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Vladi Tsipenyuk championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Vladi Tsipenyuk championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with David Mira championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with David Mira championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Sven Richter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Sven Richter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
Jordan Cruz / Ryan Ritchey
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with David Mira championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Jason Palleschi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-3
W
2026-07-06 · NJ: Kaplan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joseph Graziano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · NJ: Kaplan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Ordonez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Eastern/Kaplan/40&Over4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sidharth Dhawan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · NJD/NJ Smash · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Harrison Abrams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
79.8%
75W–19L · 60.4% of games
5.0
50%
3W–3L · 47.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer