← Search

Esteban Scornik

Longwood, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 59W–46L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Esteban Scornik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-08-23 · WPTC-Le · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Huan Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · WPTC-Le · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jose Perez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-22 · Sanlando-Vuong · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Huan Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · WPTC-Le · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dean Scornik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Christoph Beck championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · WPTC-Le · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dean Scornik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-10 · WPTC-Le · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dean Scornik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-06 · Sanlando-Vuong · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Huan Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · Heathrow- Krishnan-Team Rambo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fernando Santiago
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-30 · Heathrow- Krishnan-Team Rambo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fernando Santiago
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · Heathrow- Krishnan-Team Rambo · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Vilece
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · Heathrow- Krishnan-Team Rambo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Preston Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
51%
25W–24L · 51.4% of games
7.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 54.5% of games
8.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.5% of games
8.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert