← Search

Matthew Fairbairn

— year-end
62 matches · 39W–23L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Matthew Fairbairn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-06-23 · MLLCL-Cleveland/Bailey Rd Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Krogstie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · MLLCL-Cleveland/Bailey Rd Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Molke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-21 · #4 Doubles · with George Jackson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-09 · LJEP-Epler/NMP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Cowper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · LJEP-Epler/NMP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Eric Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-30 · LMFA-Fairbairn/BRP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Cowper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · LJEP-Epler/NMP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Eric Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-21 · LJEP-Epler/NMP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Eric Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-09 · LMFA-Fairbairn/BRP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joakim Diedrichs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-10-04 · LJEP-Epler/CSD · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeremy Cowper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-22 · MLLCL-Cleveland/Fairbairn-NMP MX 40+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Krogstie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-06-17 · MLLCL-Cleveland/Fairbairn-NMP MX 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Krogstie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
68%
17W–8L · 54.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
50%
4W–4L · 49% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova