← Search

Jennifer Kane

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 25W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Kane to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-08-06 · CACM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lise Uhrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · CACM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Beletic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · CACM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Beletic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-28 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Beletic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lise Uhrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-14 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Beletic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-06-16 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lise Uhrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-2
L
2025-05-19 · CACM BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-14 · CACM BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-07-30 · CACM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Deluccia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Jennifer Johnson
2024-07-23 · CACM TEAL · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-09 · CACM TEAL · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
36.4%
16W–28L · 47% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.7% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 39.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.4% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–8L · 31.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova