← Search

Jeri Taylor

CLEVELAND, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 15W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeri Taylor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-05-20 · A18 3.0W CSC Shaw · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Curley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-13 · A18 3.0W CSC Shaw · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynda Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-25 · A18 3.0W CSC Schuele · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Hata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · Entry Tri W CSC Schuele · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Julie Lamb
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-27 · Entry Tri W CSC Schuele · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jane Heistand
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-07 · A18 3.0W CSC Schuele · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-25 · C 6.5W CSC Montgomery · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catey Peters
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-19 · C 6.5W CSC Montgomery · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacy Goldberg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
Kathy Westphal / Michelle Nelson
2025-09-26 · C 6.5W CSC Montgomery · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacy Goldberg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-09-19 · C 6.5W CSC Montgomery · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lynda Montgomery
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-01 · A40 3.0W CSC Schuele · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Marudas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-06-24 · A40 3.0W CSC Schuele · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Marudas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
40.7%
11W–16L · 45.5% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.4% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 32.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe