← Search

Jose Feliciano

— year-end
146 matches · 83W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jose Feliciano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history146 matches
L
2026-03-25 · Eagle Harbour - Keller · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Fritz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · Eagle Harbour - Keller · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · Eagle Harbor - Sapp · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Cumpstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-28 · Eagle Harbour - Keller · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Maier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
Eugene Kasper / John Huynh
2026-01-17 · Eagle Harbor - Sapp · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Walter Rios
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-23 · Eagle Harbor Pinkerman · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-03-08 · Eagle Harbor - Sapp · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neal Goldblatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
Matthew Davis / Joao Sarpi
2025-03-02 · Eagle Harbor - Keller · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lucian Lawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Sean Kelly / Tim Fritz
2025-03-01 · Eagle Harbor - Sapp · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Hutto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-02-22 · Eagle Harbor - Sapp · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-09 · Eagle Harbor - Keller · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Walter Rios
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-08 · Eagle Harbor - Sapp · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Walter Rios
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
53%
35W–31L · 52% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 49.1% of games
8.0
77.8%
21W–6L · 57.9% of games
8.5
60%
12W–8L · 50.3% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams