← Search

Claudia Anez

Mobile, AL
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
43 matches · 24W–19L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Claudia Anez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-09-01 · CCM - Smith 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Wing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · CCM - Barlow/Hunter 7.5 Day · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · CCM - Barlow/Hunter 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leann McElroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-07-07 · CCM - Barlow 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly McGinley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-16 · CCM - Barlow 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paige Graf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-28 · CCM Hunter 55+ Winter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-30 · CCM - Hunter · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-01-15 · CCM - Hunter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Elizabeth Odom / Marilyn Pittman
2024-10-25 · #2 Doubles · with Jessica King championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-10-15 · CCM - Hunter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-10-08 · CCM - Hunter · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-10-01 · CCM - Hunter · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christie Wing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 51% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 48.8% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova