← Search

Erika Preuss

St Augustine, FL
4.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
53 matches · 33W–20L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Erika Preuss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
Elina George / Whitney Schroeder
2022-07-23 · HMTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitzi Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2022-07-12 · HMTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mitzi Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Kelly Blanks / Kelsey Keene
2022-07-08 · HMTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitzi Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
Emily Sieg / Kelly Blanks
2022-06-10 · HMTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carmen Kilday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
Beverly Kalil / Brooke Larson
2022-06-07 · HMTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susanna Styve
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Heather Brinkman
2022-06-02 · HMTC · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2022-05-24 · HMTC · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Zachary Bekkedahl / Elina George
2022-05-15 · CSU GOLD · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shawn Farnell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Joanna Malo / Erin Gray
2022-05-03 · HMTC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rhonda Bruschke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-04-26 · HMTC · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Regina Kershner / Holly Brown
2022-04-19 · HMTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carmen Kilday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-0
W
Chad Schneider / Paige Ethridge
2022-04-17 · CSU GOLD · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shawn Farnell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 55.8% of games
4.5
54.5%
18W–15L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.9% of games
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal