← Search

Emiliya Cogdill

Tampa, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
176 matches · 97W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emiliya Cogdill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history176 matches
L
2026-06-08 · HCC PowerFlowers/ W. Li · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Verdisco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · HCC PowerFlowers/ W. Li · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wei Xue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · HCC PowerFlowers/ W. Li · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fan Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-07 · HCC PowerFlowers/ W. Li · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Verdisco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-30 · HCC PowerFlowers/ W. Li · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xue Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-23 · HCC PowerFlowers/ W. Li · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Verdisco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Meng Zhang / Lisa Strickland
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · with Thao Pham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-18 · HCC Power Flowers - W. Li · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiernan O'Keefe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · HILLS/Adult55&over7.0W/ W. Li · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Min Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-26 · HCC Power Flowers - W. Li · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Min Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-21 · HILLS/Adult55&over7.0W/ W. Li · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Min Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-02-14 · HILLS/Adult55&over7.0W/ W. Li · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Min Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
66.1%
37W–19L · 58.4% of games
4.0
24.4%
10W–31L · 40.6% of games
7.0
75%
9W–3L · 59.3% of games
7.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 46.4% of games
8.0mixed
69.7%
23W–10L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
37 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer