← Search

Amanda Briggs

Albuquerque, NM
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 174W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amanda Briggs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history222 matches
L
2026-08-01 · 55 & Over 8.0W Austin - JC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Anselmo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · 55 & Over 8.0W Austin - JC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Anselmo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-25 · NNM/Crosby/55&Over/9.0W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Badger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · 55 & Over 8.0W Austin - JC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Anselmo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · 55 & Over 8.0W Austin - JC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Anselmo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-04 · NNM/Crosby/55&Over/9.0W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Susanne Korsan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-21 · 55 & Over 8.0W Austin - JC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jo Ann Erikson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · NNM/Crosby/55&Over/9.0W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andie Crosby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-07 · NNM/Wynne/40&Over/4.5X · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anthony Heames mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · NNM/Wynne/40&Over/4.5X · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anthony Heames mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-17 · NNM/Wynne/40&Over/4.5X · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anthony Heames mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-01 · Adult 18 & Over 4.5W Fate - JC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andie Crosby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
86.5%
77W–12L · 65.1% of games
8.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 56.1% of games
9.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 66.6% of games
4.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
47.2%
17W–19L · 50% of games
9.0mixed
83%
39W–8L · 62.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
114 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
38 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams