← Search

Laura Farmer

— year-end
100 matches · 48W–52L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Laura Farmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2024-10-28 · CIN A40 3.5W M CRC Omer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori McKeown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2024-10-21 · CIN A40 3.5W M CRC Omer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Ditto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-10-14 · CIN A40 3.5W M CRC Omer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Polly Bonacuse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-07-08 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Hill (IHP) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Chernoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-06-24 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Hill (IHP) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Chernoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-10 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Hill (IHP) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marianne OHara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-02-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Polly Bonacuse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-02-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Chernoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-01-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Chernoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-11-06 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Omer (CRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Polly Bonacuse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2023-10-30 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Omer (CRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Polly Bonacuse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-10-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Teams4 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 57.1% of games
3.5
31.9%
15W–32L · 44.1% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 53.2% of games
7.5mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer