← Search

Lourdes Bove

— year-end
111 matches · 64W–47L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Lourdes Bove to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-07-09 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Maxel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-05 · Wexford (Tina Poland)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carli Bouckaert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Scurry-Thomson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison OConnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 7-5
W
Melina Henry / Caitlin Moreau
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Maxel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Maxel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-02-18 · Wexford (Leigh Hebbe)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beverly Patteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-17 · Wexford (Leigh Hebbe)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beverly Patteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-16 · Wexford (Leigh Hebbe)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beverly Patteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-13 · Wexford (Dede Young)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabriele Schlicht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-28 · Wexford (Leigh Hebbe)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beverly Patteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
Teams7 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
58.9%
63W–44L · 53% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 78% of the time
#1 Doubles
78%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer