← Search

Jeffrey Greenberg

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 40W–19L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Greenberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-07-08 · BP GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ross Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-24 · BP GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Gomez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-27 · BP RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitch Dickman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · BP RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Dino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-20 · BP RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Gomez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-13 · BP RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Gomez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-15 · BP RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phillip Heyser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-16 · BP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Richmond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Stuart Adams / David Klein
2025-07-09 · BP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Richmond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-07-02 · BP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitch Dickman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-25 · BP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitch Dickman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-06-11 · BP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Troy Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
81.2%
39W–9L · 62.1% of games
4.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#1 Singles
9%
5 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer