← Search

Joy Overstreet

— year-end
67 matches · 25W–42L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Joy Overstreet to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2023-09-25 · NIN SB W Tri-Level 3.0,3.5, 4.0: SBRC Whitney · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Fredlake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-08-28 · NIN SB W Tri-Level 3.0,3.5, 4.0: SBRC Whitney · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mia Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-08-07 · NIN SB W Tri-Level 3.0,3.5, 4.0: SBRC Whitney · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Fredlake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Fredlake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2023-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Bralick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Audrey Clark / Martha Peterson
2023-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Veldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Fredlake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Bralick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
Kathleen Eldridge / Jackie Niblock
2022-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Fran Kitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2022-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
Patricia Keilman / Rita Janson
2022-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Fredlake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Pickering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Teams2 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
42.9%
12W–16L · 47.2% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 32.6% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 37.7% of games
7.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 50% of games
7.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer