← Search

Rachel Hardecke

CLINTON, WA
0.0 year-end
52 matches · 25W–27L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Rachel Hardecke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2023-02-10 · HBSQ-4two5ers-Urbas · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Lindberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-01-07 · HBSQ-4two5ers-Urbas · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Krystal Garfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2022-08-10 · 10is Chicks · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cheryl Farnham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2022-08-03 · 10is Chicks · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kari Kuipers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2022-05-21 · EDG-Moawad · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Debiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-05-06 · EDG-Moawad · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Candace Hines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-05-01 · EDG-Moawad · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Debiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-04-29 · EDG-Moawad · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Debiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2022-03-12 · HBSQ-Boone · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathleen McNamee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2022-02-05 · HBSQ-Boone · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-01-22 · HBSQ-Boone · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2021-05-15 · HBSQ-Rutter · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gini Bouche
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
34.6%
9W–17L · 46.3% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 66.1% of games
4.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#2 Singles
12%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
5 matches
#1 Female Singles
10%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova