← Search

Elizabeth Skochelak

Saline, MI
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
324 matches · 177W–147L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Skochelak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history324 matches
L
2026-08-04 · TRAVIS- Song 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Noah Skochelak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · TRAVIS- Song 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Noah Skochelak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-24 · TRAVIS- Song 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Noah Skochelak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · TRAVIS- Song 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Noah Skochelak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kayoko Chatell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Famurewa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · TRAVIS-Skochelak 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · TRAVIS-Skochelak 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Bae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · VTC-Haessler (indoor) 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Lollo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · TRAVIS-Skochelak 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rochelle Jacoby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · TRAVIS- Song 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Shell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
50%
3W–3L · 58.9% of games
3.0
63.1%
70W–41L · 55.4% of games
3.5
27.6%
8W–21L · 44% of games
5.5
75%
9W–3L · 57.1% of games
6.0
78.8%
26W–7L · 62.8% of games
6.5
50%
11W–11L · 50.8% of games
7.0
35%
7W–13L · 47.9% of games
7.5
0%
0W–7L · 28.4% of games
5.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
54.2%
26W–22L · 52.6% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
145 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
53 matches
#1 Singles
13%
41 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams