← Search

Connie Gliniecki

Merrill, WI
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 9W–22L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Connie Gliniecki to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-16 · WI Adult 18&O 3.0W NCL Wausau Gliniecki · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Snoeyenbos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2024-07-11 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W NCL Wausau Hackman/Liss · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginny Suchocki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-09 · WI Adult 18&O 3.0W NCL Wausau Gliniecki · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Ladewig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-06-20 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W NCL Wausau Hackman/Liss · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kay Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-06-04 · WI Adult 18&O 3.0W NCL Wausau Gliniecki · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Ladewig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-30 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W NCL Wausau Hackman/Liss · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-28 · WI Adult 18&O 3.0W NCL Wausau Gliniecki · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeni Seidel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stefanie Teske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-06-29 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 48.5% of games
3.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 33.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams