← Search

Michelle Fontana

— year-end
138 matches · 80W–58L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Michelle Fontana to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
W
2026-09-04 · LLHE-Hession/Jetton · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathleen Milligan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3
W
2026-08-16 · LKDR-Drag/LNRC 8.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Gay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · LLHE-Hession/Jetton · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathleen Milligan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
Charles Utz / Madison Utz
2026-07-08 · MLJHI-Higgins/Bailey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Fontana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · MLJHI-Higgins/Bailey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Venkatesh Sampoornam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-06-03 · MLJHI-Higgins/Bailey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Fontana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · with Kelly Hallman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · LKDR-Drag-Cleveland 4.5 Jetton Sunday · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Gay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Stefanie Flippin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-13 · LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 4.0 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Finke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · LKHA-Hallman/CSD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greigh Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · LJHU-Huggins/CSD · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maria Emilia de la Orden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
81.5%
22W–5L · 59.8% of games
4.5
42.1%
16W–22L · 46.6% of games
8.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 51.1% of games
4.0mixed
76.5%
13W–4L · 56.4% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert