← Search

Shirley Chapman

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 139W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shirley Chapman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history213 matches
W
2026-09-07 · ABaxley.55.6.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yuko Resseguie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-04 · Pe.LeGaux65C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-14 · Pe.LeGaux65C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-03 · ABaxley.55.6.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna Misa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-31 · Pe.LeGaux65C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Priscilla Nanney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Brenda Jones / Terrye Light
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · with Kelly Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · with Perry LeGaux championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-21 · Pe.LeGaux65A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · TOC.Lyon · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · Sh.Chapman55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-11 · TOC.Lyon · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-31 · Ap.Lyon55A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Boney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
60W–30L · 56.6% of games
3.5
62.1%
18W–11L · 56.5% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 68.4% of games
6.5
64.7%
44W–24L · 56.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
63 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal