← Search

Wanda Pipes

— year-end
90 matches · 38W–52L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Wanda Pipes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-09-10 · CTL40/Pittman/CTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Martha Farmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-09 · LATA/REAM/CAMP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Blackmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-27 · CTL40/Pittman/CTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Draffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Susan Taylor / Kerry Allen
2026-08-19 · LATA/REAM/CAMP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Blackmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · CTL18/Mucci/CTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Hayden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-03 · CTL18/Mucci/CTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vandrea Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-30 · CTL40/Pittman/CTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vandrea Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · CTL18/CLARK/CTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kate Noel Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · LATA/REAM/CAMP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Blackmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · CTL18/Mucci/CTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Hayden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · CTL40/Pittman/CTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hannah Pittman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · CTL40/Wilkes/SEP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kris Sutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams22 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
42.9%
27W–36L · 47.3% of games
6.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.5% of games
7.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 39.3% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 43.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert