← Search

Nathan Gambino

— year-end
87 matches · 63W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nathan Gambino to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-07-11 · (CPD) York College - Hack · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Oscar Castro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-02 · (CPD) York College - Hack · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-20 · (CPD) York College - Hack · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · (CPD) York College - Hack · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Oscar Castro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-29 · Wisehaven - Myers · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lauren Duffy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-20 · Wisehaven - Myers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lauren Duffy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-12-21 · Wisehaven - Flaming Dragon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Hack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-12-07 · Wisehaven - Flaming Dragon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Hack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-09 · Wisehaven - Flaming Dragon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · Wisehaven - Flaming Dragon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry McVeigh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-07-27 · #1 Doubles · with Mike Lesko championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-07-20 · York College - Hack · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Keffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
69.4%
25W–11L · 54.3% of games
5.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 63% of games
9.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer