← Search

Nancy Hauck

— year-end
45 matches · 7W–38L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Nancy Hauck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-05-15 · Blossom Aging Acefully · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dolores Arellano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-06 · Blossom Aging Acefully · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Helen Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · Blossom Aging Acefully · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sara Traugott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-19 · Rally Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elaine Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-03 · Tennis Park Golden Racquettes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Huong Edmondson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-26 · Rally Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Traugott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-19 · Rally Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Langford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-17 · Tennis Park Golden Racquettes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elaine Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-05 · Rally Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-03 · Tennis Park Golden Racquettes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elaine Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-02 · Tennis Park Golden Racquettes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynne Aranda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-29 · Rally Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Traugott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Teams17 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
16.1%
5W–26L · 31.3% of games
6.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 36.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova