← Search

Andrew DePasquale

Belleair, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
177 matches · 106W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrew DePasquale to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history177 matches
L
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Paul Solorzano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Paul Solorzano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Scott Stevens / Scott Temple
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Mony Rodon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Richard Rivas / Young Lee
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Paul Solorzano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · PINELLAS/Halm · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-05-30 · PINELLAS/Halm · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Solorzano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · PINELLAS/Halm · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · PINELLAS/Halm · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Wayne Lemmerbrock / Loretta Lombardi
2026-03-15 · McMullen Halm · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Esthela Gonzalez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-14 · McMullen Halm 18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-09 · McMullen Halm 18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · McMullen Halm · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Esthela Gonzalez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
62.2%
46W–28L · 53.7% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.1% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.2%
49W–25L · 57% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal