← Search

Jane Parry

Arlington, MA
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
24 matches · 2W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Parry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-05-01 · LTC:Lexington:Jimenez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Strong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-20 · LTC:Lexington:Jimenez · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Luca Greco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-09 · LTC:Lexington:Jimenez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Connolly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-27 · WTC:Winners:Matteuzzi/Hirsch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert McHugh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-07 · LTC:Lexington:Jimenez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eduardo Jimenez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-4
L
2025-02-14 · WTC:Winners:Matteuzzi/Hirsch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert McHugh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-25 · WTC:Winners:Matteuzzi/Hirsch · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Prabhakar Gowrisankaran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-09-27 · WTC:Winners:Matteuzzi/Hirsch · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roman Krasikov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-30 · WTC:Short, Sweet & Smashy:Wagner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorothy Kushmerek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2022-06-16 · WTC:Short, Sweet & Smashy:Wagner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Clifford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2022-05-19 · WTC:Short, Sweet & Smashy:Wagner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorothy Kushmerek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2019-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary McCabe-Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 51% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 25.5% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 31.9% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 24.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 63% of the time
#3 Doubles
63%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams