← Search

Pauline Smith

— year-end
28 matches · 14W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pauline Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-02-08 · UTC - Rubio · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcus Soori mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
Sadie Gammell / Gene Pushee
2026-01-10 · UTC - Rubio · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michal Nawalany mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-21 · Spring Winner/UTC - Shotwell · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katina Colbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-14 · Spring Winner/UTC - Shotwell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katina Colbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Tracy Ford / Patricia Kowal
2025-04-07 · Spring Winner/UTC - Shotwell · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sheri Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-06 · APEX:NetAssets:Doyle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-05-31 · APEX:NetAssets:Doyle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-16 · APEX:NetAssets:Doyle · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-15 · UTC- Shotwell · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janet Choisnet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-10-18 · Apex:Doyle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-10-15 · Apex:NetAssets:Doyle · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marsha Traill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-10-01 · Apex:Doyle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Rentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.5% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
8.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams