← Search

Margaret Filbert

— year-end
105 matches · 41W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Margaret Filbert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-05-26 · Hunters Green / P. Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marieglory Quinones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-21 · Hunters Green/ T. Farnsworth · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · Hunters Green/ T. Farnsworth · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Dasilva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-04-28 · Hunters Green / P. Morris · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Arment
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-26 · HILLS/Cotey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-21 · Hunters Green / P. Morris · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Dasilva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-14 · Hunters Green / P. Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Dasilva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-12 · HILLS/Cotey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Dasilva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-07 · Hunters Green / P. Morris · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Dasilva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · HILLS/Cotey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Dasilva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · HILLS/Cotey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Dasilva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-02-21 · HILLS/ Adult55&over6.0W/Hunters Green - C. Heggen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sherry Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
50%
5W–5L · 51.4% of games
3.5
26%
13W–37L · 41.9% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 46.4% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 72.3% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.2% of games
7.0mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#1 Singles
11%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams