← Search

Eric van Westering

HOUSTON, TX
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 41W–26L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Eric van Westering to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-06-23 · LLTC - Good Guys · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Phan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · LLTC - Good Guys · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Phan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · LLTC - Good Guys · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-04-27 · LLTC - Good Guys · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angel Tejada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-13 · LLTC - Good Guys · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kawai Fregly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-19 · MPTC - Good Guys · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Igor Frenkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-03-05 · MPTC - Good Guys · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Weston Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-26 · MPTC - Good Guys · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Igor Frenkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-11-16 · LLTC - Love Handlers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victoria Tran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-11-13 · MPTC - Good Guys · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dan Horodecky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-11-06 · MPTC - Good Guys · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Willem Slingerland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-26 · LLTC - Love Handlers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with LAN Au mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
65.5%
19W–10L · 56.3% of games
4.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.8% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.4% of games
8.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams