← Search

Nata Wayne

— year-end
12 matches · 6W–6L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Nata Wayne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history12 matches
W
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Palmera Tukpah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Palmera Tukpah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-06 · Buford City (Rachel Henderson)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sabrina Akintan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-11-08 · Buford City (Rachel Henderson)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
Linda Adams / Sam Sam Tan
2020-12-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Isaac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2020-11-14 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2020-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Isaac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2019-07-11 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
Jinhwa Lee / Yu Ran Kim
2019-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sophia Do
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
Misti Bonduris / Diana Harrel
2019-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tamiko Wayne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2019-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tamiko Wayne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2019-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sophia Do
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 2-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 48.5% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
2 matches
#1 Singles
17%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer