← Search

Jacquelyn Worman

Leesburg, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 137W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jacquelyn Worman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
L
2026-09-08 · IL - Nix · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carisa Dueweke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-07 · IL - Nix · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer East
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · IL - Eickelberg - Causing a Racquet · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-24 · IL - Eickelberg - Causing a Racquet · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-22 · IL - Eickelberg - Causing a Racquet · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Moira Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Tara Brill / Catherine Mitchell
2026-06-17 · IL - Eickelberg - Causing a Racquet · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-15 · IL - Eickelberg - Causing a Racquet · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-01 · Brill - Tennisanity · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-1
L
2026-05-29 · Brill - Tennisanity · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · Brill - Tennisanity · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-13 · Ida Lee - Eickelberg - LOCO · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Eickelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-06 · Ida Lee - Eickelberg - LOCO · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Eickelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
59.9%
103W–69L · 54.4% of games
7.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 53% of games
8.0
75%
12W–4L · 58.5% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
74 matches
#1 Singles
28%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
33 matches
#2 Singles
13%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
27 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova